.
reader comments on the on Sunday 26 September 2010 in the New OZ - New Osnabruecker newspaper articles appearing in the the » Roundtable residential care in the 50s and 60s " patron Dr. Antje Vollmer is quoted and to and their line profiled.
article by Uwe Westdörp 26th September 2010 16:49 clock @ http://www.noz.de/artikel/47999832/vollmer-niemand-darf-ausscheren
reminder of the Round Table residential care - even more hurdles on the home stretch
Vollmer: No one may veer
reader comments :
» Lothar C. , Monday, 27 September 2010, at 23:47 clock
solutions "received with great respect" ? .. What?
Quote: "The proposals and demands of the former children in care are in the words of Vollmer at the round table" was taken "with great respect
This is in no way the truth and further discloses the contemptuous attitude towards the concerns of Survivors of the former children's home hell.
Neither are the solutions proposed by representatives of the victims of the Round table itself appeared to have other victims' representatives in the minutes as an item on the agenda at all! ! !
to mention the fact that they had been at all disskutiert or even accepted.
Instead, "warned and threatened with failure who is not sworn on a line.
Whose line question arises here?
The completely disregarded and deleted from the agenda of suggestions of children in care representatives are always on the internet nachlesbar
asks, since what points of the solutions proposed by the former children in care has led to this woman of such threats can be carried away. As Mediator
this woman is clearly biased and prejudiced in favor of the offender groups. «« «
» Heidi D. , Monday, 27 September 2010, at 15:37 clock
may veer No one? Who determines that?
"We have enshrined the principle of shared responsibility in the interim report already," says Mrs. Vollmer Lieber would apparently forget that even the interim report was just NOT unanimous support -. Mrs Djurovic (alumni representative) for example, has spoken out against large parts of it. In front of television cameras by the way!
Now we learn with amazement that Ms. Vollmer is "absolutely" thinks that "no one broke away." Who do they like to think that? And above all: who should feel comfortable addressed if they emphasized in the next sentence that it should still dare someone (who probably?) Threatened to fail, the "total package".
to put it to make it very clear: the survivors of sexual, psychological and physical violence in German homes and boarding schools require adequate pain and suffering, which is international in its height to the paid or promised money and not about the alarmingly low Funds for former forced laborers hosting!
means Adequate:
● A monthly pension which can not be counted!
● Alternatively, a one-time payment of the amount of at least 15 years! ●
given (and not counted on the pain and suffering!) The acquisition cost of therapy by therapists to choose! (So only religious therapist if this is strongly encouraged!)
● The public apology from the representative of the churches and people of the state!
● An appropriate memorial in the public space
● The organization of "bases" that the survivors also offers assistance in the future
● Binding commitments to control and transparency in future home or boarding accommodation.
Reasonable means definitely not to humiliate the former home and boarding school for children with fine words, and financial "offers" again! And - even modest demand: Why should we let us offer? «« «
CROSS REFERENCE : » ignorance in all its glory: Dr. Hans-Siegfried Wiegand 'children in care representatives', has einschwören from the start on the line of Vollmer can «@ http://heimkinderopfer.blogspot.com/2010/09/ignoranz-in-vollem-glanz-dr-hans.html
CROSS REFERENCE : » What a rechtsbeugendes committee for this "Round Table home education" in Berlin, on the Dr. Antje Vollmer chaired last? "@ http://heimkinderopfer.blogspot.com/2010/10/was-fur-ein-rechtsbeugendes-gremium-ist.html
CROSS REFERENCE : » Antje Vollmer "Round Table home education" patron gets even more completely the legitimate discontent "Former home children" feel. "@
CROSS REFERENCE : » Siegfried Hans Wiegand's allies, Darmstadt psychologist Erika Tkocz, leans against the reporting of the Australian Martin Mitchell on "@ http://heimkinderopfer2.blogspot.com/2010/10/hans-siegfried-wiegands-verbundete.html
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Everyone can also HERE a substantive comment in this FORMER HOME KIDS BLOG 2 to this " FORMER HOME CHILDREN completely dissatisfied with the 'home children' representatives" Dr. Hans Wiegand-Siegfried on "Round Table offense. He has sold them. "report - AND ALSO TO EACH OTHER IN THIS REPORT BLOG ! - give, and every such comment is then HERE for all readers should be visible.
comments = comments can of Post a Comment click buttons in the footer of this paper submitted to (ie, use a scroll little bit down, there is the Post a Comment to find buttons).
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
_________________________________________________________________
My [ie Martin Mitchell] own Current Signature: A hearing or proceeding without qualified legal counsel, the law is like a building without a foundation - a house of cards, and an indictment of every "democracy" and alleged "law", where attempts to restrict it.
My [ie. Martin Mitchell's] own current signature: negotiation with The Perpetrators, your detractors and opponents without QUALIFIED legal counsel present and by your side throughout and at all times, and without reliance upon the law and jurisprudence, is like a building without a foundation - a house of cards, and any attempt at curtailment of these rights is clear evidence of incompetence, incapacity and incapability of a country's "constitutionality" and it's "democracy".
__________________________________
" We must not wait until the freedom struggle, called treason '. "(Erich Kästner )