.
A " Former foster child and member " Association of former children in care eV "(" VEHeV "/" VEH "/" VEH eV ") filed electronically on 29/09/2009 diesbetreffend a petition the Petitions of the German Bundestag .
later more than a year before ( about October 2010 - without giving a date met) from Berlin, a six-page DECISION of Petitions Committee of the German Bundestag to here (just then) in the exact wording listed petition this " former home child" with her in North Rhine-Westphalia.
All this was apparently more than a year federally in Berlin was considered , the same as that lawless body " Roundtable residential care in the 50s and 60s " in Berlin under the auspices of the Protestant theologian Dr. Antje Vollmer ( GREEN ) (launched by Petitions Committee of the German Bundestag on 26 November 2008 and initiated by the German Federal Government in February 2009. Moreover, also sits Marlene Rupprecht , MP ( SPD ) as a member of this " roundtable residential care " both as a member in Petitions Committee ).
on after performing here (just then) this petition the release of the Home filing will then (finally, at the bottom) a link to this DECISION of Petitions Committee of the German Bundestag set so that everyone can form their own opinion TO , and may also take the necessary initiative.
"the former home children" will not give up.
Public Petitions
at the German
Bundestag Petitions Committee
Platz der Republik 1 11011 Berlin
Date: 09/29/2009
petitioner: Ms. V ... ... ........., Karoline
Location: ........ ..............
Postcode: ... ..
punishment & Home: ........................
Location: Germany / Nordrhein-Westfalen
Phone: .....................
E-mail Address: .....................
wording of the petition / What you want to reach specific with your petition?
home document and related by-document must be accessible free of charge for former children in care. This Petitions relating to filing of municipal and ecclesiastical home operators. The right to inspect documents may not be limited by retention periods and destruction. Here I point to urgency, because many files will be destroyed, even though the relevant people clearly desire the realization of the Act. Canon law in this case may not be above the constitution.
Please explain your petition!
legal interests are not in the foreground, as the childhood of the seekers often was committed a long time. Home files and the corresponding any by filing, registration or school records are often the only source of information for Former resident, from which they can bring something from their childhood, and therefore about themselves in experience. Here I point to Article 2 (1) of the Basic Law. For free development of personality is the knowledge of what happened in childhood, and what has led to placement in a children's home. A violation of the rights of third I do not see here.
have in relation to the retention periods of above-mentioned document, I get different information. So it seems a clear provision to give at all here. Therefore, there should be no restrictions of retention periods.
is in relation to the destruction of records is amazing to me home, how many files were either destroyed, can not be found, various forces of nature or simply to have fallen victim. I even got to my request for access to the file, first the oral notice, the files were no longer there. A subsequent inquiry led to the same office: the file would be in a dilapidated basement, which is therefore not allowed to enter. Understand is that the archiving of file space needs. Must be destroyed for this reason, home records, must decide that the person on whom the Act was passed. A proposal Währe to hand over such a home record of the corresponding former foster child. When should lack the Destruction of the Act are noted before this takes place.
want in regard to the urgency I have not mentioned that former institutionalized children is access to the file, despite the law refused to do so. Worse, it will be destroyed just the acts in which someone wishes to inspect. But now ask more and more former children in care, because we are interested in a scientific analysis of this topic. Article 5 (3) states: "Art and science, research and teaching are free. Freedom of teaching does not absolve from loyalty to the Constitution. "Therefore, do not understand why we have former children in care such massive problems with the insight of our home files. We fear the elimination of additional home records, and a scholarly review is therefore impossible.
In terms of home files kept in the possession of the churches, they are almost unattainable for former children in care. In the only response I received in this regard, it was pointed, and others on the church law. Then the churches because of the anchorage in the Basic Law Article 140 the right to resolve internal matters subject characteristics themselves, however, the canon law should not stand above the Constitution.
If you want to give suggestions (such as keywords or questions) for the online discussion can use this field.
Dear Ladies and gentlemen,
what this petition is not legal to be pursued. The denigration of the churches is not our goal. We hope to develop our childhood and we know what happened to us, and why the accommodation in a children's home was at all necessary. Furthermore, we are eager to finally meet the taboo and the associated prejudices with which we have former resident, or today's home children to do over again.
We are interested in the scholarly review of our home time. For this we need our home files. No scientist can work if it is not the necessary equipment provided.
As far as you think it's important to send additional documents in copy (eg decisions of the authority concerned, complaints, judgments) upon receipt of the file number by post to
______________________________
Contact:
support and consultancy
Secretariat of the Committee on Petitions
place der Republik 1 11011 Berlin
Tel: (030) 227 35 257
E-mail: e-petitionen@bundestag.de
______________________________
DECISION of Petitions Committee of the German Bundestag as PDF - document available through the club website " Association of former children in care eV " (" VEHeV " / " VEH " / " VEH eV ) @ http://www.veh-ev.info/archiv/beschluss_petition_heimakten.pdf (these six pages from official hand [ the federal authorities in Berlin ? ] are numbered 40 to 46 and no date is specified in this document).
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Everyone can also HERE a substantive comment in this FORMER HOME KIDS BLOG 2 to this " Re FORMER HOME FOR CHILDREN . - Obligation to grant access to the file, or not? - Many 'former home children "continue to be fobbed off! "report - AND ALSO TO EACH OTHER IN THIS REPORT BLOG ! - give, and every such comment will then be HERE also visible to all readers.
comments = comments can of Post a Comment click buttons in the footer of this paper submitted to (ie, use a scroll little bit down, there is the Post a Comment to find buttons).
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
_________________________________________________________________
My [ie Martin Mitchell] own current signature: A hearing or proceeding without qualified legal counsel, the law is like a building without a foundation - a house of cards, and an indictment of every "democracy" and alleged "law", their attempts to minimize this behavior.
My [ie. Martin Mitchell's] own current signature: negotiation with The Perpetrators, your detractors and opponents without legal counsel present and QUALIFIED by your side throughout and at all times, and without reliance upon the law and jurisprudence, is like a building without a foundation - a house of cards, and any attempt at curtailment of these rights is clear evidence of incompetence, incapacity and incapability of a country's "constitutionality" and it's "democracy".
__________________________________
" We must not wait until the freedom struggle, called treason '. "(Erich Kästner )
